web analytics

“Value Investing” is commonly misunderstood as buying companies at a discount to their intrinsic value. While that may have been true decades ago, today “Value Investing” predominantly consists of buying low “price to something” stocks.

Let’s begin with the basics:

Value:   Monetary or material worth

Cheapness:   Relatively low in cost

Finding stocks that are low in cost relative to last year’s earnings, book value or complex combination thereof (low price to something) is hunting for cheapness.  From a portfolio construction perspective, cheapness has been an acceptable approach for decades, and likely will be again in the future. However, cheapness is not value.

Cheapness has existed as an investment concept forever, but it became institutionalized with the Fama/French’s 1993 three factor model. Cheapness has never been the same as hundreds of billions poured into equity investment strategies focused on buying low “price to something” stocks supported by reams of back test data. In addition, thousands of small investment professionals and amateurs replicate much of the process the large firms employ via access to abundant datasets on Yahoo! Finance and other such services.

This frenzy has culminated with “Value” or Cheapness investing failing over the last decade:

In fact, Graham and Dodd believed that true value investing involves deriving the value of a common stock independent of its market price.

True Value Investing requires specifying a firm’s expected future cash flows discounted for time and risk to determine if it is worth more or less than its current traded price.

Think about this, over the past decade, the business models of the world’s largest companies have dramatically changed. How much R&D were companies spending relative to Net Income in 1998 compared to today’s market leaders?

As technology accelerates the creation and disruption of industries and business models, accounting based relationships that worked well in a backtests settings will at best lag (a decade?) in efficacy until new formulations are specified and at worst are not robust enough (or maybe never?) to keep up.

Another example, companies will start capitalizing operating lease payments. How will current quantitative models handle such changes in leverage compared to decades of data that ignored such treatment?

It is important to always remember – Cheapness is not value.

Why should anyone think that last year’s earnings, next year’s earnings, or current book value represent the intrinsic value of a company which is the present value of ALL EXPECTED future net cash flows?

Applied Finance is a true “Value” investor, developing intrinsic value estimates by generating cash flow, and risk estimates for 20,000 global stocks weekly to determine their intrinsic value.

Therefore, it is not surprising that The Valuation 50 results have deviated significantly from cheapness strategies.

In a typical slice of the most attractive or unattractive stocks ranked on price to book vs deviations from intrinsic value, the overlap is less than 40%.

The Valuation 50 is a unique investment strategy that has performed extraordinarily well, ranking in the top 5% for Large Cap Strategies since its inception in 2004 according the Zephyr.

True Value investing hasn’t stopped working, cheapness has.

An important, but unstudied issue for practitioners and academics to understand is:

• Do cheapness strategies independently generate excess returns?

or…

• Are cheapness strategies simply correlated to intrinsic value, which generate excess returns?

Join us in our upcoming Valuation Driven™ Webinar Series

Drawing from over 20 million real time valuations performed by Applied Finance since 1995, we explore these topics in depth.

  • The Gross Profitability Trap

    The Gross Profitability Trap “But this time, it’s different!” More foolish words are rarely spoken in the financial industry, but they always seem to find their way back into the stock market lexicon. A firm’s [...more]
  • Intrinsic Value Factor®

    February 4, 2019 Applied Finance

    Valuation Driven™ Investing begins and ends with calculating the intrinsic value of every stock in a benchmark against which a portfolio is constructed, and comparing those values against traded prices. All of Applied Finance’s portfolios are Intrinsic Value Driven™, which differs significantly from a “value” perspective. To gain a better understanding into Applied Finance’s Intrinsic Value Driven™ approach, let’s first review traditional approaches to “Value”.

    The traditional approaches to finding undervalued stocks use a simple ratio such as P/E or P/B, or a mix of them. These common approaches to value come with many shortcomings: […more]

  • Then and Now: Buyers Remorse Versus Sellers Loss

    October 31, 2008 Applied Finance
    Over the past couple months, worsening macro economic conditions, declining corporate profitability and a bottomless stock market have investors longing for the good old days when the economy delivered steady increases in GDP growth with [...more]
  • Economic Margin®

    A corporate performance metric should provide insights into what a firm is worth. Most money managers utilize common earnings-based measures of corporate performance and value, which are suspect and easy to manipulate. Applied Finance developed the Economic Margin (EM) framework to remove the noise inherent in accounting data.

    Traditional accounting-based valuation methods provide an incomplete view of a company’s value by not accounting for the investment needed to generate the earnings, cost of capital, inflation or cash flow. […more]